No audio because of Amber Altert; sorry. Abstention Papers due tomorrow.
Prep the rest of Chapter 9, which will carry us through the final two classes. Remember to read Lackey v. Stinnie (Supp Materials), which resolves the circuit split discussed at pp. 343-44. Consider how this interacts w/ Mootness.
Consider a slight twist on Noah C. (p.352): Imagine that following his suspension the school enacts a policy prohibiting all speech on matters of public concern on school grounds during school hours. In addition to challenging his suspension, Noah wants an injunction prohibiting enforcement of that new policy. What are the potential mootness problems on all of his claims and how might he address them.
