Prep the remainder of Chapter 6.
• Which civil rights statutes validly abrogate and which do not and why?
• Consider whether the following claims by a fired attorney can proceed under the Americans With Disabilities Act:
• Attorney working at Greenberg Traurig
• Attorney working for the Miami-Dade County Attorney
• Attorney working for the Office of the Florida Attorney General
• Can states be sued (by name) under § 1983?
• How does the precise right being enforced matter? Consider the validity of ADA claims against a state entity in the following cases:
• Prisoner with disability challenging prison conditions
• Bar applicant with disability challenging conditions for taking bar exam
• What is the doctrine of Ex parte Young? What are its terms and elements? How does it relate to § 1983?
• What are the legal fiction(s) on which it rests? What is the argument it is not a legal fiction at all?
• Prep all remaining Puzzles for the chapter.
I expect to finish this on Tuesday, so the next panel should be ready to go Tuesday.
