Review Syllabus and Assessments; these contain complete details about the course, assignments, pedagogical approach, course rules, and grading methods. You should bring the Syllabus with you to every class.
Class Meetings
• No class on Tuesday, January 6. Will be made up.
• No class on Monday, January 19 for MLK Day.
• No class on Monday, March 23. Will be made up.
Technology and Class Conduct:
Use of laptops, tablets, book readers, smart phones, and similar devices during class is absolutely prohibited, unless you have received permission or accommodation in advance.
AI Policy
Do not do it.
The use of ChatGPT and other generative AI, LLM, or similar programs for written assignments is prohibited and will be deemed a violation of FIU and College of Law academic policies.
Plagiarism Policy
Do not do it.
Required Course Materials:
Appendix B: Emancipation Proclamation
All reading will be in Understanding Civil Rights Litigation, supplemented by a handful of cases and additional materials. We will spend most class time on the Puzzles from each chapter and less time working through the doctrine, especially on the problem-intensive sections. This is the trade-off: There is less reading in this class and the reading is more straightforward than parsing cases yourself. But you must learn the doctrinal and theoretical basics (including the facts and details of key cases listed on the syllabus) through the short and straight-forward reading in preparing for class; you must understand the basic rules, standards, and ideas on a broad level, then apply that to our discussion of the Puzzles and problems.
First Day Assignments: After the jump.
Emancipation Proclamation (App. B)
42 U.S.C. § 1983
18 U.S.C. § 242
34 U.S.C. § 12601 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 14141)
Consider:
• Understand the history of congressional action from the end of the Civil War, through Reconstruction, and until 1877. What are the ideals underlying the various constitutional amendments and legislation?
• What are the different mechanisms and postures for asserting constitutional rights? What is the goal and purpose of each?
• Is the judge in Brock v. City of Ord correct in his complaint about the plaintiff? How does that view view square with the existence and purpose of the civil rights statutes we are focused on?